REVIEWED MAY 2024

Model & noted laws ::

A list of model ordinances that restrict dangerous dog breeds that have withstood legal challenges, and noted ordinances that contain a blend of spaying and neutering and anti-tethering provisions.

Model restricted breed ordinances

Breed Restriction Ordinances
Jurisdiction View Ordinance Type of Ordinance
California
San Francisco Section: 43 Mandatory spaying and neutering: pit bulls
Colorado
Aurora No longer active Prohibits fighting breeds: pit bulls, American bulldogs, dogo Argentinos, canary dogs, presa canarios, presa mallorquins, Japanese tosas, cane corsos and fila Brasilairos
Denver No longer active Prohibits: pit bulls (became the basis of the International Municipal Lawyers Association model pit bull ban)
Florida
Miami-Dade County No longer active Prohibits: pit bulls
Iowa
Council Bluffs Section: 4.20.112 Prohibits: pit bulls | Upheld in 2022
recent ruling
Des Moines Section: 18-41 to 18-59 Pit bulls declared "high risk"
Keota Section: 4-1-8 Prohibits: pit bulls
Maryland
Prince George's County Section: 3-185.01 Prohibits: pit bulls | Upheld in 2024
recent ruling
North Carolina
Edenton Section: 90.43 Pit bulls, rottweilers and chow chows declared "potentially vicious"
South Carolina
Beaufort County Section: 14-30 Mandatory spaying and neutering: pit bulls, American bulldogs, American bullies and cane corsos
Wisconsin
Village of Fall River Section: 7-1-11 Prohibits: pit bulls

Noted restricted breed ordinances

Breed Restriction Ordinances
Jurisdiction View Ordinance Type of Ordinance
Arkansas
Garland County Section: 10-16 Declares pit bulls, dogo Argentinos, presa canarios and cane corsos "high risk breed"
Cabot Section: 4-114 Pit bulls declared "potentially dangerous," mandatory spaying and neutering, microchipping and insurance requirements
Little Rock Section: 6-19 Pit bulls declared "potentially dangerous," mandatory spaying and neutering, microchipping and anti-tethering requirements
California
Lancaster Section: 6.08, 6.08.020 Mandatory spaying and neutering: pit bulls and rottweilers
Georgia
LaGrange Section: 10-30-40, 10-30-41, 10-30-42, 10-30-45 Restricts: pit bulls, including mandatory insurance, spaying and neutering, and specific enclosure
Kansas
Wichita Section: 6.04.010, 6.04.052 Mandatory spaying, neutering and microchip: pit bulls; limited to two pit bulls per household; prohibits wolf-dog hybrids
Michigan
Alma Section: 10-58 Pit bulls declared "vicious" by rebuttable presumption
Saginaw Section: 94.025, 94.026 Restricts top 5 most dangerous dog breeds - "Any dog of a breed that appears consistently in the top five (5) of the breeds on credible, analytical listings of 'Most Dangerous Dogs' as verified and supplemented by local data and records for Saginaw County."
Ypsilanti Charter Township Section: 14-1 Mandatory spaying and neutering: pit bulls
Nebraska
Falls City Section: 6-218 Restricts: pit bulls, rottweilers, bullmastiffs, cane corsos, canis panthers (Donovan pinschers) and presa canarios, including mandatory spaying and neutering and passing a Canine Good Citizen test or its equivalent
Omaha Section: 6-157, 6-163, 6-165 Restricts: pit bulls, dogo Argentinos, presa canarios, cane corsos and American bulldogs, mandatory insurance
Ohio
Bexley Section: 618.16 Restricts: pit bulls, including mandatory insurance, spaying and neutering and the prohibition of electric fencing
Washington
Prosser Section: 6.40.010 Pit bulls declared "potentially dangerous," mandatory insurance and microchipping, exemption for passing Canine Good Citizen test or its equivalent
Wisconsin
Augusta Section: 11.05 Pit bulls, rottweilers and wolf-dog hybrids declared "high risk," mandatory leashing, muzzling, insurance and anti-tethering requirements

Related court decisions: